Accidental Death and Dismemberment claims often turn on paperwork that looks ordinary at first glance: an ER chart, a police narrative, a toxicology result, a policy exclusion buried in small print, or a denial letter that points to one phrase without explaining how it fits the facts. In many AD&D disputes, the fight is not only about what happened, but about how the record tells the story.
That is why organization matters.
When an insurer questions whether a death or injury was truly “accidental,” or argues that a sickness, intoxication, medical treatment complication, or other exclusion applies, the claim file often becomes the center of the dispute. Under ERISA claims-procedure rules, claimants in many employer-sponsored plans are entitled to access relevant documents and records, and denial notices generally have to identify the specific reasons for the adverse decision and reference the plan provisions relied on in making it (29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-1; U.S. Department of Labor Advisory Opinion 2005-06A). Medical records can also be obtained directly from providers under HIPAA’s access rules, with federal regulations recognizing an individual’s right to inspect and obtain protected health information in a designated record set (45 C.F.R. § 164.524).
In this post you’ll learn how to organize the three record categories that often matter most in an AD&D case: medical records, incident reports, and exclusion language. You’ll also see how a clean file can help an attorney evaluate causation, spot inconsistencies, and compare the insurer’s rationale against the actual policy text. If you want a broader overview of the coverage disputes that often frame these cases, it may help to start with this guide on how accident definitions, exclusions, and causation fights shape AD&D denials.
<aside> 💡 Scroll to the bottom for every post in this series.
</aside>
AD&D cases are often document-heavy because the insurer is trying to answer a narrow question: Was the loss caused by a covered accident, or was it excluded?
That sounds simple, but the answer may depend on several records created by different people for different reasons:
These records do not always line up perfectly. One chart may mention a prior condition in passing. Another may leave out timing details. A report may use shorthand that sounds definitive but was really provisional. A denial letter may cite one exclusion while ignoring another part of the policy definition.
That is one reason claim procedure rules matter. For many ERISA-governed plans, denial notices generally have to provide the specific reasons for the adverse determination and identify the plan provisions relied on, while claimants can request relevant documents, records, and other information relating to the claim (29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-1). The Department of Labor has also noted that proof of claim in AD&D matters may include police accident reports, autopsy reports, laboratory results, hospital records, X-rays, and narrative reports (U.S. Department of Labor Advisory Opinion 2005-06A).
In practical terms, good organization helps answer four recurring questions: