Securities employment disputes can get confusing fast. A termination, compensation fight, promissory note claim, U5 issue, team-raiding allegation, or deferred compensation dispute may look like a regular workplace case at first glance. But in the broker-dealer world, many of these conflicts end up in a very specific forum: FINRA arbitration.
That forum question matters. It can affect timing, filing strategy, discovery, costs, leverage, and even whether a court keeps the case at all. If you want a broader foundation first, it may help to start with this overview of how securities industry employment disputes are generally categorized.
In this post, you’ll learn how to tell whether a securities employment dispute likely belongs in FINRA arbitration, when it may not, and where some of the biggest gray areas tend to show up.
<aside> 💡 Scroll to the bottom for every post in this series.
</aside>
In the securities industry, employment disputes are often governed by the FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry Disputes. Under FINRA Rule 13200, arbitration is required for certain disputes that arise out of the business activities of a member or associated person and are between or among members and associated persons. That basic rule sounds simple, but applying it to a real employment fight often takes a closer look at the facts.
The practical reason this matters is straightforward: if a claim belongs in FINRA arbitration, a court may not be the place where the dispute ultimately gets resolved. FINRA has also stated in Regulatory Notice 16-25 that member firms generally cannot require associated persons, in a predispute agreement, to waive their right to FINRA arbitration for disputes covered by the Industry Code.
So the first question usually is not just “Do I have a claim?” It is often “Where does this claim go?”
A securities employment dispute often belongs in FINRA arbitration when the answer to both of these questions is yes:
FINRA Rule 13200 applies to disputes between or among:
See Rule 13200.
That means the identities of the parties matter. FINRA’s definitions section explains that an “associated person” is a person associated with a member, using the meaning supplied by the FINRA By-Laws in Rule 13100. FINRA rules also commonly treat a formerly associated person as an associated person for Industry Code purposes, which can matter in post-termination disputes. The SEC’s Guide to Broker-Dealer Registration also notes the role of Form U4 in registering industry professionals and documenting employment history.
In plain English, this often includes registered representatives, brokers, advisers working through FINRA-member broker-dealers, supervisors, branch managers, and some others tied to the securities business of the firm.