If you’re dealing with a securities dispute, it’s common to hear the words mediation and arbitration used almost interchangeably. They are related, and both are offered through FINRA’s dispute resolution forum, but they are not the same process. The differences can affect cost, timing, privacy, leverage, and how much control each side keeps over the outcome.
In simple terms, FINRA mediation is a voluntary settlement process, while FINRA arbitration is a formal adjudicative process that ends in a binding decision. FINRA describes mediation as an informal process in which a neutral mediator helps parties negotiate a mutually acceptable resolution, while arbitration resembles a court case more closely, with discovery, hearings in many cases, testimony under oath, and a final award issued by arbitrator(s) FINRA’s overview of arbitration and mediation, FINRA’s arbitration process overview.
That distinction sounds straightforward on paper. In practice, though, the choice between the two often shapes how a dispute unfolds. In this post you’ll learn what makes FINRA mediation different from FINRA arbitration, how each process works, and what parties often weigh when deciding where mediation fits into a securities case.
<aside> 💡 Scroll to the bottom for every post in this series.
</aside>
The shortest explanation is this:
Under FINRA’s rules, mediation is voluntary, and any party may withdraw before a written settlement agreement is signed FINRA Rule 14109. By contrast, arbitration often proceeds because the parties are already bound by an arbitration agreement or because FINRA rules give customers the right to bring certain disputes in FINRA arbitration FINRA Filing FAQ, Regulatory Notice 21-16.
That difference alone changes the tone of the case. In mediation, the focus is usually on resolution by agreement. In arbitration, the focus is usually on proving claims and defenses for a final ruling.
If you want a broader foundation on how the settlement process works in this setting, it may help to start with this overview of when voluntary negotiations in a FINRA case may make sense.
This is one of the biggest practical differences.
In FINRA mediation, the parties make the outcome. The mediator does not decide who wins, does not issue an award, and does not impose a result. FINRA’s mediation ground rules expressly state that the mediator has no authority to determine issues, make decisions, or otherwise resolve the matter FINRA Rule 14109.
In FINRA arbitration, the arbitrator or panel makes the outcome. FINRA explains that arbitrators render a final and binding decision, and that arbitration awards are subject to court review only on very limited grounds FINRA’s overview of arbitration and mediation, FINRA Filing FAQ.
That often matters because many securities disputes are not just about legal liability. They may also involve reputation concerns, confidentiality concerns, risk tolerance, business relationships, or uncertainty about damages. Mediation gives the parties room to shape a result around those concerns. Arbitration generally produces a yes-or-no style determination with an award.
Yes, but with an important nuance.
FINRA mediation is voluntary and non-binding unless and until a settlement agreement is signed. FINRA states that any party can withdraw from mediation before execution of a written settlement agreement FINRA Rule 14109. FINRA also explains that parties who do not settle in mediation may continue with arbitration FINRA’s overview of arbitration and mediation.